Aerial photography and videography
The flying is the easy part. What governs an aerial shoot is airspace, people below and line of sight, and when a mast beats an aircraft.
Stills work is booked by discipline, and each discipline carries its own kit, pace and deliverable count. The word photography covers a corporate portrait session running twelve people through a meeting room in an afternoon and a food shoot where a single plate occupies two hours, and nothing about the second is a scaled-up version of the first. The entries below record each discipline as the trade uses the term: what the brief has to specify, what happens on the day, and what leaves at the end.
Three things separate one discipline from another in practice, and none of them is subject matter. The first is who else has to be there. A headshot sitting is a photographer and a subject. A fashion frame is a photographer, a stylist, hair and makeup, an assistant and frequently a digital operator, and the picture cannot be taken until all of them have done their part. The second is what has to be controlled. Product and food work control light and surface completely and are therefore largely indifferent to weather and daylight, while architectural, real estate and location work are timed around the sun and lose the day when it does not appear. The third is how many finished files the brief asks for, which is the variable that decides how much of the work happens after the shoot rather than during it.
A commercial stills brief resolves to four lines, and a brief missing any of them is incomplete rather than concise. The first is the shot list, or at minimum the count of distinct setups the shoot has to produce. The second is the number of finished, retouched files to be delivered, which is a separate number from the shot list and usually a smaller one. The third is the scope of use: where the pictures will appear, for how long, and in which territories. The fourth is the date, because a stills unit is small enough to be booked quickly and location access rarely is.
Retouching deserves naming rather than assuming, because the word covers two different classes of labour. Correction is the removal of things that were not meant to be in the frame and the balancing of colour and exposure across a set, and it is ordinary post- production on any commercial job. Reconstruction changes what the photograph asserts: composited backgrounds, altered proportions, objects added or removed. The first is priced by the set, the second by the frame, and the conventions differ sharply by discipline. A casting portrait is retouched restrainedly on purpose, because the picture is a promise about who will walk into the room. A packaging still is built to a specification and reconstruction is expected.
Consistency is the requirement that most often goes unstated and most often causes trouble later. A single portrait is a picture; a staff directory is a system that has to survive people joining and leaving for years. That means the lighting, background, crop and processing all have to be repeatable months later, by the same photographer or by a different one, and repeatability is a thing that has to be written down at the first session rather than reconstructed at the third.
Each entry below documents one discipline: who is normally present, what the day is organised around, and what the deliverable is. No prices are stated anywhere in this reference. A session fee is meaningless without the setups, the licence and the file count it covers, and an averaged figure is not something a reader can check. Where a number is genuinely needed, the documents worth reading are the public and dated ones: the municipal tariff that sets permit fees for a location, and the published rate agreements that cover engaged crew and performers.
The flying is the easy part. What governs an aerial shoot is airspace, people below and line of sight, and when a mast beats an aircraft.
Photographing cars splits into a repeatable volume pipeline and a slow, built hero image. The kit overlaps; the process does not.
What commercial photography covers, why the licence rather than the day rate is the commercial substance, and who else is on a stills crew.
Why corporate photography is a library problem rather than a shoot problem: matching new joiners to old portraits, and a licence for reuse.
Event photography is unrepeatable, so the discipline is planning: a run sheet of must-have moments, access agreed in advance, and delivery.
Fashion photography is a team assembly problem: casting and agency terms, hair, makeup and styling, sample logistics, and usage.
Fitness photography is limited by physiology, not equipment: how a call sheet is paced around exertion, and how release forms work.
How food photography is booked: why a stylist changes the result more than the camera, and what the licence has to cover.
How headshot work is booked in Toronto: what a professional sitting includes, what actors and corporate clients each need, and the factors that set cost.
When the photographer travels to the subject the space is unknown: power, ceiling height and mixed light are discovered on arrival.
How product photography is priced and produced: why per-item logic differs from every other shoot, and what marketplaces require.
Property media runs on a listing date: one visit for stills, video and floor plans, light dictating the hour, and who owns the images.
The technical demands are steep, but what governs sports photography is permission: accreditation, positions and league rights.
A genre describes what the picture is of. A discipline describes how the day is run: who is present, what has to be controlled, and how many finished files leave at the end. Two disciplines can photograph the same object and share almost nothing operationally, which is why briefs are written by discipline.
Because the frames are not the work. Setting up a light, dressing a set, positioning a subject and directing an expression consume the session, and the number of usable frames that produces is a consequence rather than a target. A brief written around a file count usually turns out to have been a brief about setups.
A look is one combination of subject, background and lighting. Changing any single element of it is a new setup, and setups are the unit a session is actually spent in. Counting looks before booking is the most reliable way to know whether a brief fits the time allowed for it.
Fewer than the shoot produces, and the number is a decision rather than a discovery. Delivery is normally a set of retouched selects chosen from the contact sheet, so who chooses, and whether the client sees the whole sheet or a shortlist, is worth settling before the shoot rather than after it.
Copyright and licence are separate questions from the fee, and the second one is what a buyer actually needs. What matters in a brief is the scope of use: which territories, which media, how long, and whether paid placement is included. A shoot cleared for a website and used in an advertising campaign is the recurring dispute in commercial stills.
When it makes a claim on public space. A crew on private property is working under a contract with the owner; the same crew putting a light stand on a pavement, reserving parking or asking the public to walk around a frame is usually in permit territory, with its own tariff and lead time set by the municipality.